The Importance of Expert Testimony in Proving Corruption Crimes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60153/ijolares.v1i2.20Keywords:
Evidence\, Expert Testimony, CorruptionAbstract
The criminal act of corruption is an extraordinary crime that has an extraordinary impact on the state and the survival of its people. Corruption as an extraordinary crime requires extraordinary handling efforts as well, especially in the process of proving it. Proving corruption often requires the role of experts from several disciplines to ensure that corruption has actually occurred. The purpose of writing this article is to analyze the existence of expert testimony as evidence in proving corruption and the extent to which expert testimony contributes to convincing judges that corruption has occurred. The writing of this article uses normative legal research methods with a statutory approach. The results of this study are that the submission of expert testimony to the trial of corruption will increase the judge's confidence in the truth of other evidence submitted by the public prosecutor, and strengthen the judge's conviction to pass a sentence of punishment if indeed from the existing evidence the defendant is legally and convincingly proven to have committed corruption.
Downloads
References
Alamri, H. (2017). Kedudukan Keterangan Ahli Sebagai Alat Bukti Menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana. Lex Privatum.
Anak Agung Gede Budhi Warmana Putra, Simon Nahak, I. N. G. S. (2020). Pemidanaan Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Melalui Double Track System. Denpasar.
Arief, B. N. (1984). Saru Kuliah Hukum Pidana II. Bandung.
Arsyad, J. H. (2017). Korupsi Dalam Perspektif HAN. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Hamzah, A. (2009). Terminologi Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Harahap, M. Y. (1985). Pembahasan permasalahan dan penerapan KUHAP. Jakarta: Pustaka Kartini.
Harahap, M. Y. (2010). Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Made Mahadwiva Surya Krishna, I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha, N. M. S. K. (2021). Sistem Pembuktian Terbalik Dalam Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, 2(2).
Mertokusumo, S. (1999). Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Muhammad, A. (2004). Hukum Dan Penelitian Hukum. Bandung: Penerbit Nusa Media.
Najemi, W. dan A. (2020). Pengaturan Uang Pengganti Sebagai Pidana Tambahan dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. PAMPAS: Journal Of Criminal Law, 1(1).
Putra, I Wayan Werasmana Sancaya, I. M. A. M. putra. (2021). Tanggungjawab Perusahaan Angkutan Terhadap Kerugian Yang Ditimbulkan Akibat Kelalaian Pengemudi Selama Kegiatan Penyelenggaraan Pengangkutan. Jurnal Kertha Wicaksana, 15(1).
Rambey, G. (2016). Pengembalian Kerugian Negara Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Yogyakarta.
Sofian, A. (2020). Keterangan Ahli Dalam Tingkat Penyidikan Dugaan Tindak Pidana. Jakarta.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ismawati Septiningsih
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
