Sources of Administrative Law in Vietnam: A Comparative Framework for Legal Harmonization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60153/ijolares.v3i2.185Keywords:
Administrative Law, Judicial Precedent, Legal Harmonization, Legal Diversification, Soft LawAbstract
Vietnam's shift from a centrally planned economy to a market-oriented system under the Đổi Mới reforms has exposed significant challenges in its administrative law system. Traditionally based on a civil law model that prioritizes hierarchical legal documents, the system is now increasingly influenced by judicial decisions, international treaties, and informal administrative practices that are not formally recognized as legal sources. This study uses a comparative legal method, analyzing administrative law frameworks in France and the United Kingdom, to evaluate how Vietnam’s legal system addresses these emerging complexities. The research draws on legal texts, court rulings, and administrative guidelines from all three countries to assess coordination mechanisms and identify governance gaps. For instance, in Vietnam, the absence of legal recognition for judicial precedents leads to inconsistent application of laws across provinces. To address these issues, the study proposes a hybrid harmonization model: integrating judicial precedents into the legal hierarchy, defining general principles of administrative law, and establishing institutions responsible for legal coherence. These reforms aim to improve administrative accountability and support Vietnam’s legal modernization in line with its ongoing economic integration.
Downloads
References
Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v. Wednesbury Corporation, [1948] 1 KB 223.
Brown, L. N., & Bell, J. S. (2008). French administrative law (5th ed.). Oxford University Press
Confederation of Asian and Pacific Judicial Administrators (CACJ). (2021). Sources of law - Vietnam. https://cacj-ajp.org/vietnam/legal-system/legal-system-of-vietnam/sources-of-law/
Council of Civil Service Unions v. Minister for the Civil Service, [1985] AC 374.
Craig, P. (2013). The nature of reasonableness review. Current Legal Problems, 66(1), 131-167. https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/cut010
Daly, P. (2019). Substantive review: Categories, context, controversy. Administrative Law Matters. https://www.administrativelawmatters.com/blog/2019/02/22/substantive-review-categories-context-controversy/
Dindjer, S. (2021). What makes an administrative decision unreasonable? The Modern Law Review, 84(3), 487-515. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12581
Fairgrieve, D., & Muir Watt, H. (2007). Common law and civil law: Convergence and divergence in judicial review of administrative action. Cambridge University Press.
Federal Judicial Center. (2024). Vietnam country profile. Judiciaries Worldwide. https://judiciariesworldwide.fjc.gov/country-profile/vietnam
Georgetown University Law Library. (2024). Legal system - French legal research guide. https://guides.ll.georgetown.edu/francelegalresearch/legalsystem
Harvard Law School. (2016). Administrative justice in France: Between singularity and classicism. Harvard International Law Journal, 57(2), 183-234. Flavier, Hugo and Froger, Charles, Administrative Justice in France. Between Singularity and Classicism (September 15, 2016). BRICS Law Journal, Vol. 3(2), p. 80–111, 2016, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2903077
Hickman, T. R. (2010). Public law after the Human Rights Act. Hart Publishing.
Jowell, J. L. (2000). Beyond the rule of law: Towards constitutional judicial review. Public Law, 2000(4), 671-683.
Kaur, N. (2023). Analyzing the application and evolution of Wednesbury's principle in administrative law: A comprehensive review. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4649238
KENFOX IP & Law Office. (2024). Vietnamese People's Court system and how it works in Vietnam. https://kenfoxlaw.com/vietnamese-peoples-court-system-and-how-it-works-in-vietnam
Asia Business Law Journal (2025). Vietnam's boldest administrative haul. Asia Business Law Journal. https://law.asia/vietnam-administrative-judicial-reform/
Le Sueur, A. (2010). The rise and ruin of unreasonableness. Judicial Review, 15(1), 32-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2005.11426414
Lexology. (2022). Court precedents in Vietnam. https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=c1b3667b-9ee9-41a6-9898-137346dc607b
Melleray, F. (2009). L'utilisation du droit étranger par le Conseil d'État statuant au contentieux. Revue française de droit administratif, 25(4), 779-793.
New York University Law School. (2024). Vietnam legal research - Globalex. https://www.nyulawglobal.org/globalex/vietnam1.html
Nicholson, P., & Pham, L. P. (2018). Roots and routes: Adapting the Soviet-inspired Vietnamese court and procuracy system. In Socialist law in socialist East Asia (pp. 45-78). Cambridge University Press.
Oxford Business Group. (2023). The report: Vietnam 2023. Oxford Business Group.
Pham, T. T., Nguyen, T. H., Vo, T. B., & Nguyen, H. T. (2020). Legal framework for environmental impact assessment in Vietnam: The challenges between the regulations and practice. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 81, 106344. DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202016411008
R v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Doody, [1994] 1 AC 531.
R (on the application of Mott) v. Environment Agency, [2016] EWCA Civ 564.
Rose-Ackerman, S., Lindseth, P. L., & Emerson, B. (Eds.). (2017). Comparative administrative law (2nd ed.). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Stirn, B. (2009). Le Conseil d'État, so British? In M. Andenas & D. Fairgrieve (Eds.), Tom Bingham and the transformation of the law: A liber amicorum (pp. 815-828). Oxford University Press.
Supreme People's Court of Vietnam. (2019). Resolution No. 04/2019/NQ-HĐTP on the process of selection, disclosure and application of case law. https://english.luatvietnam.vn/resolution-no-04-2019-nq-hdtp-dated-june-18-2019-of-the-judicial-council-of-the-supreme-peoples-court-on-process-for-selecting-publishing-and-adop-174737-doc1.html
UK Human Rights Blog. (2020). The standard of reasonableness in Canadian and UK judicial review. https://ukhumanrightsblog.com/2020/02/04/the-standard-of-reasonableness-in-canadian-and-uk-judicial-review-1-adrienne-copithorne/
University of Melbourne. (2024). Case law - Southeast Asian region countries law. https://unimelb.libguides.com/c.php?g=930183&p=6722026
U.S. Department of State. (2025). Country reports on human rights practices 2022: Vietnam. https://www.state.gov/reports/2022-country-reports-on-human-rights-practices/vietnam/
Vietnam Law Magazine. (2022). Civil precedents in Vietnam: Legal grounds and practice. https://vietnamlawmagazine.vn/civil-precedents-in-vietnam-legal-grounds-and-practice-69872.html
Wade, H. W. R., & Forsyth, C. F. (2014). Administrative law (11th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Wilberg, H., & Elliott, M. (2015). The scope and intensity of substantive review: Traversing Taggart's rainbow. Hart Publishing. https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/scope-and-intensity-of-substantive-review-9781509906192/
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Vu Minh Chau
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
