Constitutional Limits of Regional Autonomy in Indonesia: A Legal Assessment of Local Government Practice

Authors

  • I Wayan Kandia Institut Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Saraswati
  • I Putu Windu Mertha Sujana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
  • Jhon Pieter Latuconsina Universitas Pattimura
  • Bagdawansyah Alqadri Universitas Mataram

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60153/ijolares.v4i2.380

Keywords:

Regional Autonomy, Constitutional Law, Decentralization, Central Regional Relations, Constitutional Compliance

Abstract

Regional autonomy in Indonesia presents a continuing constitutional challenge concerning the balance between regional self-government and central state authority.  This study examines whether contemporary local government practices remain within the constitutional limits of regional autonomy, particularly in relation to the distribution of authority and central government supervision. The study concludes that regional autonomy can be constitutionally legitimate when exercised within clear legal boundaries, proportionate supervision, institutional accountability, and safeguards for citizens’ constitutional interests. The findings indicate generally positive perceptions of constitutional compliance (overall mean = 3.60/5.00), although central government supervision received the lowest assessment (mean = 3.46), indicating concerns regarding the boundary between legitimate supervision and excessive intervention. The findings indicate an overall mean assessment of 3.60 out of 5.00, reflecting generally positive perceptions of constitutional compliance. Constitutional authority received the highest mean score of 3.72, while central government supervision received the lowest score of 3.46. The study concludes that regional autonomy can be constitutionally legitimate when exercised within clear legal boundaries, proportionate supervision, institutional accountability, and safeguards for citizens’ constitutional interests. The study contributes a constitutionally bounded autonomy framework that evaluates regional authority through legal authorization, proportional central supervision, institutional accountability, and protection of constitutional interests.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agustino, L., Hikmawan, M. D., & Silas, J. (2024). Decentralization in Indonesia: From reformation to the local regime. Public Policy and Administration, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.13165/VPA-24-23-2-09

Aritenang, A. F. (2020). The effect of intergovernmental transfers on infrastructure spending in Indonesia. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 25(3), 571–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/13547860.2019.1675352

Astriana, S., & Khoirunurrofik. (2024). Fiscal decentralization and governance performance: Empirical evidence from the district city level in Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Pembangunan, 13(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.29244/jekp.13.1.2024.15-29

Baidhowah, A. R. (2022). Explaining decentralization performance in Indonesia: Member of Parliament decision, political networks, and Constitution amendment. Jurnal Bina Praja, 14, 97–109.

https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.14.2022.97-109

Blackham, A. (2022). When law and data collide: The methodological challenge of conducting mixed methods research in law. Journal of Law and Society, 49(S1), S87–S104. DOI: 10.1111/jols.12373

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. DOI: 10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238

Byrne, D. (2022). A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality & Quantity, 56, 1391–1412. DOI: 10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y

Chandra, Y. (2024). Assessing the impact of decentralization on the quality of Indonesian democracy. Global Strategis, 18(2), 409–430. https://doi.org/10.20473/jgs.18.2.2024.409-430

Chin, J. M., DeHaven, A. C., Heycke, T., Holcombe, A. O., Mellor, D. T., Pickett, J. T., Steltenpohl, C. N., Vazire, S., & Zeiler, K. (2021). Improving the credibility of empirical legal research: Practical suggestions for researchers, journals and law schools. Law, Technology and Humans, 3(2), 107–132. DOI: 10.5204/lthj.1875

Chin, J. M., & Zeiler, K. (2021). Replicability in empirical legal research. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 17, 239–260. 10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-121620-085055

Choudhary, K. (2024). Which method should I select for my legal research—Doctrinal, empirical, multi-method or something else? Teisė, 132, 135–144. DOI: 10.15388/Teise.2024.132.10

Cotterrell, R. (2023). A socio-legal quest: From jurisprudence to sociology of law and back again. Journal of Law and Society, 50(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12403

Gonschorek, G. J. (2021). Subnational favoritism in development grant allocations: Empirical evidence from decentralized Indonesia. World Development, 139, 105299.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105299

Hummel, D., & Kusumasari, B. (2025). Local government financial performance and decentralization in Indonesia. State and Local Government Review, 58(2), 206–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323X251364379

Ibad, S. (2025). Analysis of the concept of regional autonomy based on constitutional development in Indonesia. HUKMY: Jurnal Hukum, 5(2), 1096–1111. https://doi.org/10.35316/hukmy.2025.v5i2.1096-1111

Khairi, H. (2021). Balance between delegation of authority and submission of regional revenue sources in Indonesia. Jurnal Bina Praja, 13, 431–443. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.13.2021.431-443

Kristanto, S. B., Wardhani, R., Siswantoro, D., & Ekananda, M. (2026). Fiscal decentralization, governance, and corruption: Evidence from Indonesian local governments (2010–2021). Cogent Business & Management, 13(1), 2652136. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2026.2652136

Lele, G. (2021). Asymmetric decentralization, accommodation and separatist conflict: Lessons from Aceh and Papua, Indonesia. Territory, Politics, Governance, 11(5), 972–990. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2021.1875036

León-Mantero, C., Casas-Rosal, J. C., Pedrosa-Jesús, C., & Maz-Machado, A. (2020). Measuring attitude towards mathematics using Likert scale surveys: The weighted average. PLOS ONE, 15(10), e0239626. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239626

Nugraha, A. (2024). Integrated coastal management in the current regional autonomy law regime in Indonesia: Context of community engagement. Australian Journal of Maritime & Ocean Affairs, 16(4), 508–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/18366503.2023.2283355

Putra, I., & Lubis, A. F. (2024). Decentralisation and constitutional law in Indonesia: Balancing regional autonomy and national unity. West Science Law and Human Rights, 2(2), 175–181. https://doi.org/10.58812/wslhr.v2i02.1169

Rahayu, P., Woltjer, J., & Firman, T. (2021). Shared water resources in decentralized city regions: Mixed governance arrangements in Indonesia. Urban Water Journal, 18(9), 771–781. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2021.1931358

Sabara, A. R. (2022). Regional autonomy in the political system and authority in Indonesia. Diponegoro Law Review, 7(2), 296–311. https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.7.2.2022.296-311

Saputra, N. A. A., & Setiawan, D. (2021). Fiscal decentralization, accountability and corruption indication: Evidence from Indonesia. Jurnal Bina Praja, 13(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.13.2021.29-40

Shoesmith, D., Franklin, N., & Hidayat, R. (2020). Decentralised governance in Indonesia’s disadvantaged regions: A critique of the underperforming model of local governance in Eastern Indonesia. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 39(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/1868103420963140

Siburian, M. E. (2024). Fiscal decentralization and corruption: A case of Indonesia. Applied Economics Letters, 31(1), 87–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2022.2128164

Silitonga, M. S., Wittek, R., Snijders, T. A. B., & Heyse, L. (2023). Democratizing corruption: A role structure analysis of Indonesia’s “Big Bang” decentralization. Applied Network Science, 8, 8.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s41109-023-00535-w

Sulaiman, S., Mastura, M., & Mumaddadah, M. (2025). The legal policy of decentralization in strategic natural resource management: Acceleration of local government independence pursuant to the rule of law principle. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v7i2.587

Sutresno, E., Reza, I. F., Wati, N. K., & Gashimov, E. (2024). Prefectural system practices in the Indonesian local government. Journal of Governance and Public Policy, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.v11i3.20224

Yuliasih, A., Astawa, I. G. P., Suding, S., & Yassine, C. (2026). Constitutional consistency of Indonesia’s Job Creation Law and its impact on regional autonomy. Jambura Law Review. https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v1i1.34262

Downloads

Published

2026-09-30

How to Cite

I Wayan Kandia, I Putu Windu Mertha Sujana, Jhon Pieter Latuconsina, & Bagdawansyah Alqadri. (2026). Constitutional Limits of Regional Autonomy in Indonesia: A Legal Assessment of Local Government Practice. IJOLARES: Indonesian Journal of Law Research , 4(2), 104-117. https://doi.org/10.60153/ijolares.v4i2.380

Similar Articles

11-19 of 19

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.