LAW AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SOCIAL TRANSFORMATION: A THEORETICAL AND EMPIRICAL STUDY OF THE ROLE OF LAW IN DRIVING CONTEMPORARY SOCIETAL CHANGE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60153/ijesss.v1i2.201Keywords:
Law, Instrument, Transformation, Theoretical, EmpiricalAbstract
This article explores the multifaceted role of law as a catalyst for social change, integrating theoretical insights with comparative empirical analysis. Drawing from classical sociological perspectives, critical legal studies, and interdisciplinary approaches, the paper examines how legal systems both reflect and shape evolving societal norms, values, and power dynamics. Through selected case studies—including civil rights reforms, environmental legislation, gender equality policies, and digital privacy laws—it highlights the conditions under which legal reforms succeed or fail in producing meaningful social transformation. The findings reveal that while law can institutionalize progressive change, its effectiveness depends on a range of factors, including political will, enforcement mechanisms, legal culture, and public legitimacy. The article argues that law functions most effectively as an instrument of social change when integrated with broader strategies of civic engagement, structural reform, and inclusive governance. Ultimately, the study underscores the necessity of a critical, context-sensitive, and future-oriented legal framework capable of addressing the complexities of contemporary social challenges.
Downloads
References
Bourdieu, P. (1987). The force of law: Toward a sociology of the juridical field. Hastings Law Journal, 38(5), 805–853.
Cotterrell, R. (2006). Law, culture and society: Legal ideas in the mirror of social theory. Ashgate.
Durkheim, É. (2013). The division of labor in society (W. D. Halls, Trans.). Free Press. (Original work published 1893)
Friedman, L. M. (1975). The legal system: A social science perspective. Russell Sage Foundation.
Galanter, M. (1974). Why the “haves” come out ahead: Speculations on the limits of legal change. Law & Society Review, 9(1), 95–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053023
Kartika, I. M., & Umbu, M. L. (2024). Demoralisasi Pancasila Dalam Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia. IJOLARES: Indonesian Journal of Law Research, 2(1), 1-6.
Kurniawan, I. D. (2023). The Meaning of the Principle of Material Legality in the Reform of Indonesian Criminal Law. IJOLARES: Indonesian Journal of Law Research, 1(2), 37-40.
Merry, S. E. (2006). Human rights and gender violence: Translating international law into local justice. University of Chicago Press.
Santika, G. N., Sujana, G., & Winaya, M. A. (2019). Membangun Kesadaran Integratif Bangsa Indonesia Melalui Refleksi Perjalanan Historis Pancasila Dalam Perspektif Konflik Ideologis. JED (Jurnal Etika Demokrasi), 4 (2). Jurnal Equilibrium e, 2477(0221), 2339-2401.
Santika, I. G. N. (2020). Menelisik Akar Kegaduhan Bangsa Indonesia Pasca Disetujuinya Hasil Revisi UU KPK Dalam Perspektif Pancasila. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Sosial, 6(1), 26-36.
Santika, I. G. N. (2021). Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan: Studi Komparatif Konstitusi Dengan UUD 1945.
Santika, I. G. N. (2021b). Aktualisasi pancasila dalam berbagai dimensi kehidupan.
Santika, I. G. N. (2022). Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan: Problematika Hasil Perubahan UUD 1945 Secara Konseptual.
Santika, I. G. N. (2023). Kedudukan Pancasila dalam Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia. IJOLARES: Indonesian Journal of Law Research, 1(2), 47-51.
Santos, B. de S. (2002). Toward a new legal common sense: Law, globalization, and emancipation (2nd ed.). Butterworths LexisNexis.
Semadi, A. A. G. P. (2024). Peran Media Sosial Dalam Upaya Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia. IJOLARES: Indonesian Journal of Law Research, 2(1), 14-19.
Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Yale University Press.
Sudiarta, I. N. (2024). Pengaturan Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional. IJOLARES: Indonesian Journal of Law Research, 2(1), 25-31.
Sujana, I. G. (2024). Kedudukan dan Fungsi Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Pasca Perubahan UUD 1945. IJOLARES: Indonesian Journal of Law Research, 2(1), 7-13.
Sujana, I. G., & Kandia, I. W. (2024). Indikator Lemahnya Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia. IJOLARES: Indonesian Journal of Law Research, 2(2), 56-62.
Tamanaha, B. Z. (2001). A general jurisprudence of law and society. Oxford University Press.
Trubek, D. M., & Galanter, M. (1974). Scholars in self-estrangement: Some reflections on the crisis in law and development studies in the United States. Wisconsin Law Review, 1974(4), 1062–1102.
Unger, R. M. (1976). Law in modern society: Toward a criticism of social theory. Free Press.
Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology (G. Roth & C. Wittich, Eds.). University of California Press. (Original work published 1922)
Wiryawan, I. W., & Sujana, I. G. (2023). Tanggung Jawab Penerima Hibah Uang yang Bersumber dari APBD oleh Pemerintah Daerah. IJOLARES: Indonesian Journal of Law Research, 1(2), 41-46.
Yablon, C. M. (1985). The meaning of the rule of law. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 133(3), 561–596. https://doi.org/10.2307/3312106
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 I Wayan Kandia, I Wayan Wiryawan (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
